Washington, September 22 (HS): President Donald Trump has called upon Attorney General Pam Bondi to initiate investigations into several political opponents, including former FBI director James Comey, New York Attorney General Letitia James, and Democratic Senator Adam Schiff. In public remarks, the president expressed frustration over the lack of prosecutions, asserting such inaction damages the nation’s reputation. “We can’t delay any longer,” he said, adding, “They have to act. They have to act fast.” Trump openly praised Bondi for her work, while announcing the departure of a federal prosecutor, Erik Siebert, who he claimed failed to pursue charges against James—a move reportedly due to insufficient evidence.
The president’s demands quickly drew sharp criticism from Democratic leaders. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer warned the approach amounted to turning the Justice Department into an instrument for political retribution, declaring, “This is the path to a dictatorship.” Legal and political observers expressed concern that such actions threaten the department’s decades-old tradition of operating independently from presidential influence.
Trump’s latest intervention follows a pattern of efforts to steer federal law enforcement toward perceived adversaries. Investigators found insufficient grounds for pursuing Letitia James on the mortgage fraud allegations cited by Trump, who had previously lost a civil fraud lawsuit brought by her. The president has also revoked security clearances for officials involved in cases against him and dismissed prosecutors overseeing investigations into his own conduct.The president’s supporters argue he is holding political figures accountable, while critics contend these moves erode the rule of law and the principle of impartial justice. The episode underscores the deepening divide over the proper limits of executive authority and the resilience of checks and balances in American governance.
The president’s insistence on accelerating prosecutions against opponents has injected fresh tension into the U.S. political landscape, prompting questions about the impartiality of federal law enforcement and the integrity of democratic institutions. As Washington remains sharply divided, the episode raises the stakes for the Justice Department’s ability to operate free of perceived political interference.
This story is from a syndicated feed. the content has not been edited by The Central Post staff.
